Saturday, March 31, 2007
On the list, I saw a new, rare brand called Orijen. This stuff sounds really good. It's 45% crude protein! I'd have to special order it since it's not even available in New York State yet.
What do you think?
According to the same AP story, New York officials are sticking by their guns:
New York officials stuck to their aminopterin finding and pointed out that it was unlikely that melamine could have poisoned any of the animals thought to have died after eating the contaminated pet food. Melamine is used to make plastic kitchen ware and is used as a fertilizer in Asia.
An FDA official allowed that it wasn't immediately clear whether the melamine was the culprit.
So which foreign substance is killing thousands of cats and dogs? Could it be a combination of both? And in practical terms, does it make you feel any better about Menu Foods, knowing that both a rat poison and a plastics chemical have been found in their food?
I guess this news doesn't bother the dozens of pet food companies who continue to use Menu Foods as their manufacturer.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Oh, and who gets the $414 bill for this testing? I think either Nutro or Menu Foods should have to pay for this. We wouldn't have taken them for testing if they hadn't been eating Nutro Natural Choice packets for years. It's their fault. They should pay. Who should I be trying to collect from?
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
“The FDA has provided the following case definition for field investigation/cases: veterinary documented renal failure, necropsy results if animal died, food consumed within 1 week of death (illness), and intact, unopened cans of the food.”
This gives us a hint as to the standard for associating a death with the recall. It requires a practically dispute-proof set of facts – a responsibility for the court of law, not the agency whose duty is to protect us – and gives us an insight into why they are still quoting the party line of 16 deaths. (Remember that Iraqi minister during the war who insisted to the media that Iraq was winning while US tanks were rolling into Baghdad? Yeah, this sounds totally different.)
So imagine that your pet has just died of renal failure after you fed him a packet of Menu Foods toxic brew. In order to get on the FDA's list you need to have:
- A Document from Your Vet
- A necropsy (pet autopsy) performed to prove the cause of death. This is an expensive procedure and probably gutwretching for the pet parent who just wants to bury or cremate her pet and grieve. Why on earth would you pay hundreds of dollars for a necropsy so you can help the FDA increase its stats?
- Unopened cans of the toxic food lying around the house (but what if you had already tossed them or returned them b/c they had been recalled OR what if the can you fed was your last one?)
- Some way of proving your pet consumed the food within a week of getting sick.
You can see why it's impossible to add to the FDA's list. Frankly, I'm not even sure how they got those 16 deaths on their tally. Maybe those are all laboratory animals.
Anyway, here are some numbers:
Pet Connection is asking for reports and has received nearly 2,000 reports of pet illness or death. Of course, this is only from people who know about their survey so it's neither here nor there.
Today, the Veterinarians Information Network, an online community of 30,000 vets, claims to have received 471 reports. However, we simply don't know how many vets logged in and reported every case to them.
So how many pets are affected? A lot more than 16!
I'm looking right now Petsitusa's up-to-date list of companies and where their foods come from. There are even more companies that use Menu Foods on here than I ever imagined. What is really disturbing is that some of these companies appear on the "do not test" list even though they do business with a Menu Foods, a company with a reputation for vicious animal testing. Maybe PETA isn't really taking that hard a look at these companies.
For example, both Wysong and Nature's Variety appear on the PETA list, but they also both appear on the list of companies that use Menu Foods to make canned food for them. Is it ok not to test on animals yourself if you do business with a manufacturer that tests?
I feel particularly duped by Wysong. I bought some Wysong Au Jus this past weekend b/c I was under the belief that Wysong didn't use Menu Foods. In fact, according to Petsitusa, the Au Jus is made by Menu Foods. In the garbage it goes! Apparently, you just can't win. It seems like, with a handful of exceptions (Merrick and Blue Buffalo come to mind), everybody uses Menu Foods for something.
Does the pet food industry have no shame?
That said, the vet we saw was not the same guy we've always seen and he seemed to think that the boys need to lose weight, even though the previous vet thought they were a fine weight. At today's checkup, the boys weighed about 14.2 pounds each. At January's annual checkup they weighed 15 pounds and our regular vet said 15 pounds is fine for them as long they don't get heavier. It seems that they've lost weight. Should I be trying to get them to lose more? They don't look fat to me.
That said, I think the boys will lose weight now that they aren't eating Nutro packet food anymore. I think it had some fattening ingredients that they could do without. I also think we need to play da bird with them more often. However, they're not exactly lazy. They chase each other around and wrestle several times a day.
Anyway, we await the blood test results with hope but just a little nervousness.
Monday, March 26, 2007
We want to inform all of our friends that BLUE products are NOT part of the national pet food recall.
The message reassures us that their food is not being recalled, but it doesn't say whether they do business with Menu Foods.
I wrote a note to Blue Buffalo, asking them if they use Menu Foods and they wrote me back today with the following response:
Thank you for taking the time out to write us. And thank you for your
interest in BLUE. BLUE products have never been produced by Menu Foods
and we are not affiliated with them in any way. In addition, all of our
formulas are gluten free and we do not use wheat in any of our products
Great news! I wrote them back to advise them that they'd help better their own reputation if they simply came out and stated as much on the home page of their Web site.
Companies should be proud to NOT be associated with Menu Foods. Of course, what we still don't know -- and should probably ask -- is what company makes their food and whether that company does animal testing, but until I know otherwise, I give Blue the benefit of the doubt and many kudos for not doing business with scumbags like Menu Foods.
Arthur and Beowulf have shown no symptoms at all of being poisoned, but my friend Janet Tobiassen DVM, About.com's Guide to Veterinary medicine, left me the a comment I could not ignore:
A simple blood and urine test will yield a lot of information and a hopefully a huge piece of mind! Veterinary experts are now saying that while the initial focus was on acute kidney damage/failure, they are now expecting that there are animals that may experience subclinical chronic failure. Once signs are seen (weight loss, drinking and urinating frequently, etc.) is very difficult to reverse.
Anyway, I think we waited so long because
- We had called the same vet the week before and he said not to bother bringing them in unless they showed symptoms. This time, we insisted.
- Taking the boys to the vet is very traumatic for them and for us. The very act of leaving the house freaks them out.
- I'm actually terrified that somehow they'll break out of their carriers, run down the streets of Manhattan, and never be seen again.
- Of course, we're also worried that something negative will come up on the test, but I'm hopeful b/c I've seen no reason to believe they are sick. But what if it turns out that they have some other disease we didn't know about.
So please send good wishes. I didn't want to take them for testing, but after reading some of your comments, we're going to take them.
Oh, and if they make it back ok, I'm going to send the bill for the testing either to Menu Foods or to Nutro Products. It's their fault I need to have the boys tested. Which one should I send it to? Menu Foods made the poisoned product, but Nutro sold it. Who's going to take responsibility?
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Over the past several days, I've been scouring the Web, looking for cat food companies that don't do business with Menu Foods. It's not always easy to find out which companies do business with Menu Foods and which companies don't. As a professional wordsmith, I have a tendency to read into the language that people or companies use when they communicate.
Let's look at two pet food company Web sites and how they describe their lack of involvement in the recall. Our first example comes from Old Mother Hubbard's Wellness site, which as of this writing, reads:
Wellness and Old Mother Hubbard products are NOT affected by the recent Menu Foods product recall.
If you click-through to a longer explanation, OMH uses the term "not involved," but they never say that they do with Menu Foods on their site. That said, in an email to me, an OMH rep confirmed that they use Menu Foods and they're proud of it.
Now, let's look at the home page for Natural Balance Foods:
NO Natural Balance® products are producedby ANY company associated
with the Pet Food Recall.
That's a pretty clear statement that Natural Balance Foods does not do business with Menu Foods. I see this statement from Natural Balance about not working with Menu Foods and also their message about animal testing and I want to buy their products:
Natural Balance® was built on the premise of helping animals, and we have never nor would we ever allow any testing that would be considered harmful to an animal. We do not conduct laboratory testing on animals, whatsoever. All of our feeding trials are conducted in the animal's own environment, in conjunction with veterinarians, kennels, breeders and pet owners, to ensure that all Natural Balance® products are extremely palatable, nutritious and the best possible formulation for the health of your pet. Our feeding trials are a positive experience and enjoyable for animals!I think we have to appreciate that level of honesty and full disclosure from a company like Natural Balance. And I'll also give Old Mother Hubbard, the maker's of Wellness, some credit for owning up to their relationship with Menu Foods. I'll never buy their products again, but at least they were honest with me when I asked them about it.
As of this writing, I have emails out to a couple of pet food companies whose products I use or would like to use, asking them about whether they do business with Menu Foods or not. One of these is Blue Buffalo, makes of Spa Selects, whose Web site, as of this writing, ambiguously states:
We want to inform all of our friends that BLUE products are NOT part of the national pet food recall.
Ok, but are they made by Menu Foods or not?
The lesson of this recall is that pet parents need to know more than that to feel good about buying pet food. We need to know whether our money is helping Menu Foods. At least this consumer does.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
We are aware that Menu Foods has initiated a recall. No products made by Wellness & Old Mother Hubbard are affected in any way.
Again, no Wellness, Old Mother Hubbard, or Neura products are part of this recall.
Menu does make some of our foods, although they do not make any of our dry foods.
There are two very important factors in determining the quality of a food. The first is the manufacturer. In this case, Menu Foods is a top notch manufacturer that receives excellent scores for food safety and quality systems. They make a consistent product which is exactly what the company asks for. Frankly, they make product for so many companies because they are one of the best..
The second factor is formula. Ingredient selection can make or break product quality. Certain ingredients can be allergens to certain pets. Other ingredients can be sourced for either their quality or their price. Chicken ingredients, for example, can be sourced at various prices. Low ash chicken, which is better for a cat, can be sourced at a higher price. Those are the types of ingredients we use, because they are of higher quality. So I would not assume all companies are created equal. If you'd like to learn more, please call us. We have much more information where that came from!
(emphasis is mine)
I appreciate OMH's candor here. They clearly chose Menu Foods for a reason and they have no regrets. While I believe their food is high-quality stuff, I'm deeply troubled by their continued support of a company which conducts deadly animal tests, produces poisoned food, and then sits on information which could have saved lives in an attempt to save face.
I'm also concerned by OMH's position on animal testing. Here is an explanatino of the animal testing policy from the OMH Official FAQ:
Q: Why are you not on PETA's "Do Not Test List"?
A: In order to be placed on PETA's "Do Not Test List", we would be required to sign a contract that states that we approve of everything that PETA does and that we cannot alter or change our formulas without informing them first. While we have great admiration and respect for PETA's agenda, upon legal consultation, we were advised that it was not in our company's best interest to sign their contract.
I'm going to try to contact PETA and ask about their requirements for getting on the "Do Not Test List," but on the face of it, this just doesn't sound right to me. If you look at the PETA list, there are plenty of products on it. Are they all running their formulas by PETA on a regular basis?
Is Old Mother Hubbard actively doing bad things to animals? We don't know. Here's what they say in the FAQ:
Q: Why can't you give me the information on the animals that you use to test the food? Are they kept in cages? What about the kennel? Can I contact them?
A: The animals that are used are privately owned and kept in kennels for a period of 4 days for the feeding trials to see how they like our food. For any further information you would need to contact AAFCO.
Let's assume for a second that the privately-owned kennel, which we know nothing about, is incredibly humane. The fact is that Old Mother Hubbard does business with Menu Foods and, as a business partner, is helping Menu Foods stay in business. Menu Foods has a track record of killing dogs and cats, whether through inaction or animal testing.
I am sorry to have to do this, but I think I'm going to have to switch brands. I can't have my money supporting Menu Foods.
If a cat and a dog are duking it out, I'll always side with the cat. If a cat does something bad, I'll make excuses for him. I hate the movie Cats & Dogs because the cats are villains.
Why am I pro-cat? I don't consider myself a softie or a bleeding heart, but look at the picture below and tell me why I shouldn't be staunchly pro-cat?
This, BTW, is a terrible picture of me, but a great picture of Arthur. Why do I always look scraggly in these pictures? Because these moments tend to happen when I've been sitting around on the couch late at night or on a weekend.
Anyway, I found a couple of interesting tidbits in Nutro's Recall FAQ. First, they attempt to answer the question of why they use Menu Foods as a manufacturer in the first place:
Why does Nutro use Menu Foods as a contract manufacturer for production of wet foods?
Canned and foil pouch wet foods are a small part of Nutro's overall production. Our limited volume does not allow Nutro (and a great many other pet food companies), the economy of scale required to own a wet food facility.
We use a contract manufacturer because they provide wet food production capacity and expertise. Contract manufacturers are required to follow strict quality standards in the production of Nutro's wet products. Nutro is implementing additional guidelines that will ensure that the quality control measures used by our co-manufacturers and their suppliers are strengthened so that this deeply troubling situation never happens again.
In another section of the FAQ, Nutro mentions that all of its dry food is self-manufactured. I'm sorry Nutro, but your "economy of scale" story just doesn't make a lot of sense.
How is it that a company like Merrick Petcare can manufacture all of its own canned food, but you can't? Merrick is on a lot of store shelves, but they're more of a boutique brand than Nutro. Nutro cans and packerts sit on the shelves at Petco and Petsmart, the two largest national chains. It's hard to believe that you can't make your own wet food.
Here's another one of the FAQs that caught my eye:
Does that mean that all pet foods contract manufactured by Menu Foods are essentially the same, just branded under different labels?
No. As a contract manufacturer for Nutro, Menu Foods creates Nutro brand products according to our own proprietary recipes using our specified ingredients. These formulas are made exclusively for Nutro. Our recipes and ingredient profiles are the result of years of research and development, and meet the highest quality standards for nutrition and taste. Our foods are different!
If their foods really are different, then why did they end up with the same gluten as everyone else? If the process is so hands-on for Nutro then they should have been paying closer attention to what Menu Foods was doing.
I'm sorry, but Nutro sold the contaminated food under their label, and they are responsible for it. Frankly, I also feel responsible for feeding their product to my boys and for recommending it to so many people. I won't make that mistake again.
Well, think again, because Menu Food's stock price rose by 30.8 percent on the "good news" that rat poison was found.
This means that somewhere large institutional investors were sitting around their computer terminals reading stories about aminopterin, about class action lawsuits being filed against Menu Foods, and about the company promising to pay veterinary costs for thousands for people. The investors' response: buy, buy, buy!
I'll never understand Wall St. I guess the going theory is that, because a toxic agent has been identified, the company's troubles are over and it's a good time to buy. Nevermind that every dollar you invest is seen as a vote of confidence and a ringing endorsement of company policy. Nevermind that by investing in Menu Foods, you are asking for more of the same.
"Over the past seven days we have spoken with almost 200,000 consumers. They are scared. Some, like myself, were angry. They demonstrated a level of care and concern that only those of us who are pet owners can understand."And don't worry folks. Menu Foods will also pay your vet bills.
(via Canada.com and the Canadian Press)
I understand that vet bills can get expensive, but somehow I doubt that this lame attempt at contrition coupled with a vague offer to reimburse expenses is going to cut it with pet parents.
You know what Paul? Since you've shared your pain with us, I feel like I can ask you anything and you'll just open up and share. So tell me:
Who are you angry at?
Are you angry at all the pet parents who complained that your food was making them sick for weeks, possibly as far back as December?
Are you angry at the laboratory test animals who, rather than simply dying from your poison, should have jumped out of their cages and howled "this tastes like aminopterin?" Maybe they even would have, if they had vocal chords.
Are you angry at the media for revealing the pet food industry's dirty little secret, that so many "trustworthy" brands use a careless, cruel, safety-indifferent company to make their wet food products?
Or are you angry at yourself? Somehow, I doubt it.
Friday, March 23, 2007
At this point, nobody knows for sure where the aminopterin came from and whether it is the only cause of the poisonings.
ABC News reports that the aminopterin might have come from Chinese wheat:
Investigators, meanwhile, are looking into whether the rat poison came into the United States on an ingredient used in the recalled food. ABC News has learned that Menu Foods bought wheat gluten, the only ingredient changed in its plants, from China.
However, the AP (via CNN) quotes two experts who cast doubt on wheat as the source of the aminopterin.
The first, an expert in pest management, doubts that rodenticide could end up in wheat:
Bob Rosenberg, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Pest Management Association, said it would be unusual for the wheat to be tainted.
"It would make no sense to spray a crop itself with rodenticide," Rosenberg said, adding that grain shippers typically put bait stations around the perimeter of their storage facilities.
Andre Rosowsky, an expert in aminopterin, tells the AP that the food may have been deliberately tampered with:
Rosowsky speculated that the substance would not show up in pet food "unless somebody put it there."
According to the AP, Menu Foods says their products could not have been tampered with because the poison showed up in foods made at two separate plants. I think that really depends on your definition of "tamper." Perhaps poison ended up in the wheat because someone tampered with the wheat back in China or at some point before it reached the food plants.
Before we start looking for a culprit, another problem remains. We don't really know whether aminopterin is the cause or even a cause of the poisonings. ABC News quotes some skeptical vets:
"Renal failure is not the expected response to these drugs," said Susan Weinstein, executive director of the Massachusetts Veterinary Medical Association. She added that most rodent poisons work as severe anticoagulants — meaning they cause the rats that ingest them to bleed to death.
"Whether this particular toxin in this case can create renal failure depends on how this drug works in the body, which may be an entirely different pathway than the anticoagulants," Weinstein said. "Because we aren't yet familiar with this toxin, we can't be confident of the causation link."
Honestly, I hope this is the cause, because otherwise we're back to square one and the poisonings will continue.
According to both the AP and ABC News, Menu Foods continues to manufacture food in both of the affected plants. I guess they couldn't lose a day's profit or a night's sleep over this. For Menu Foods, the grinders of the giant pet food machine have to keep spinning, no matter what the cost in lives.
But, through everything, my boys stick by me, even if they're just sitting on my desk and watching me work on the computer. It means a lot to me that I turn my head and see one or both of them lying in the bed right next to my keyboard and encouraging me while I work.
Here's a picture of Arthur:
Thursday, March 22, 2007
That last time they ate Nutro was last Thursday or Wednesday. They have shown no signs of being ill in any way. However, if all Nutro was contaminated for months (perhaps as far back as December), then they were eating contaminated food for months.
My fiancee Liz called our vet on Tuesday and asked if we should take them in for tests. The vet told her not to bother bringing the boys in for a checkup unless they started to show symptoms. They seem fine. OTOH, do you think this food could have long-term negative effects?
Most sources I've read claim that if your pet is ill, he will become ill within a very short period of time after eating the contaminated food. But just now I read an article on ABCnews.com where a leading vet said something a little different.
According to ABC, veterinarian Cathy Langston, of New York's Animal Medical Center said "I'm worried that there are more deaths to come from chronic renal failure over the next several months. It's not over."
Is it "not over" because people with this contaminated food in their pantries will continue feeding it and unknowingly poisoning their pets or because people like me will get an unpleasant surprise several months from now?
I also consulted an online friend who is a vet and told me that I should go with my vet's advice. What do you all think? Am I reading too much into the ABC News quote?
- No Wellness food is subject to the recall
- Menu Foods does not make dry food and I only feed the dry Wellness. I use other brands for wet food.
- I have no idea who really manufactures the Wellness dry food. Maybe they use a reputable manufacturer for their dry products.
That said. I'm really disillusioned with the whole Wellness brand after reading that they Wellness uses Menu Foods as a manufacturer. I sent an email to Old Mother Hubbard, makers of the Wellness brand, a few days ago and have received no response. I asked them to explain why they would use a disreputable vendor like Menu Foods, but I received no response.
So now I'm thinking I should switch dry foods. Let's assume for a second that Wellness dry food is a high-quality product with good nutritional properties and my boys love to eat it. However, I feel like I may need to switch brands of dry b/c:
- How Can I Trust Them?: If Menu Foods makes Wellness's wet food, how do I know that they use a reliable, trustworthy manufacturer for their kibble? If they would use a careless, greedy, safety-unconscious company like Menu Foods to manufacture some of their products, how can I trust that something similar won't happen to their dry food in the future?
- How Can I Support Them?: Every dollar I give to Wellness is being used to help prop up Menu Foods, a company which callously disregards or deliberately destroys the lives of cats and dogs. Remember, that they probably knew enough to recall the poisoned pet food months ago and that they have a horrible reputation for torturing laboratory animals.
So should I ditch Wellness out of concern, out of principle, or both? If I ditch Wellness, would can I switch to that would be as good for the boys and would taste and smell the most like Wellness? And if I did switch, how would I know that the brand I switched to was not just as irresponsible? I can now find a list of which brands use Menu Foods as a manufacturer and which don't, but that doesn't tell me if the companies are any more humane or cautious in their manufacturing processes.
What do you think?
Monday, March 19, 2007
Starting in December, concerns began filtering back to the company through toll-free customer lines about the "cuts and gravy" style pet food.
Callers complained their animals had fallen ill after eating the food, although no direct link was established.
Of course, AP reports say the company told the FDA that complaints started on February 20th. So the question is this: how long as Menu Foods known it was peddling poison? Was it a month or three months? Either way, they sat on that knowledge for a long time.
Menu Foods told the FDA it received the first complaints of kidney failure and deaths among cats and dogs from pet owners on Feb. 20. It began new tests on Feb. 27.
During those tests, the company fed its product to 40 to 50 dogs and cats and some seven animals – the mix of species was not immediately known – died, Sundlof said. The contamination appeared more deadly to cats than to dogs, he said.
So they knew about this for a month, they took their time acting on the recall, and even better, they tested the poisonous food on dogs and cats in a laboratory, just to see how many would die! As I said yesterday, Menu Foods has a well-established reputation for animal cruelty.
Some of you may not like PETA and I don't agree with everything they do, but I believe their report on Menu Foods and its animal test labs. Apparently PETA had an undercover investigator working in the labs for 9 months. During that time, she witnessed countless acts of cruelty. I'm particularly disturbed by this graph:
A cat used in a Menu Foods study whom PETA’s investigator had befriended had a large cut on his chin. The vet techs told our investigator that this unfortunate cat was “evil,” and instead of treating the cat humanely, they put betadine in a spray bottle and tried to spray the cat in the face from outside the cage, squirting him in the mouth and causing him to salivate profusely. Later, the technicians indicated that the “problem was resolved,” yet the investigator saw that the cut looked much worse and informed the lab’s director of the cat’s condition. Although the vet techs were told to euthanize the cat immediately, he suffered for five more days before the vet techs finally got around to destroying him.
But I think this was the piece de resistance:
Shortly before our investigator quit her job at the lab, the lab director ordered the vet techs to debark all the dogs because he was being disturbed by their desperate cries for attention. A vet tech told our investigator that a researcher in Menu Foods’ New Jersey office gave permission for the dogs’ vocal chords to be cut out.
So it's great to know that their response to finding out that their food was poisoning cats and dogs was to feed the same poisonous food to the animals locked in their lab of horrors.
Why did Menu Foods wait so long to issue it's recall and why did it issue the recall on a Friday night? I think the answer is contained in its press release:
The Fund estimates that based on currently available information, this recall could cost between $30 million and $40 million, which will be financed from a combination of internally generated cash flow and bank credit facilities.
I wonder how many animal's lives that $40 million is worth to "The Fund?" I used to work for a public company where we'd always put out negative news like poor earning reports on Friday nights so that the market had time to "digest" it. Maybe Menu Foods was hoping that by throwing this information out there on a Friday night, it would have more time to reassure nervous investors before markets reopened on Monday morning. Indeed, Menu Foods' stock dropped today by 24% on Monday. How much might it have dropped if this recall was announced at the opening bell or even at 2 pm on Friday?
Nevermind, that every hour Menu Foods delayed releasing this news, someone was feeding a cat a packet of contaminated food. Stores were selling poison in a packet and nobody was the wiser. Then, after releasing the information Friday Night, Menu foods waited until 6 am on Saturday morning to post its list of recalled products. But even then, the list was incomplete. Even more brands were added later on. But of course when you secretly manufacture as many brands of food as "The Fund," it's easy to lose track of exactly where you slung your slop.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Unless you've been hiding under a rock this weekend, you know that there's a major recall of wet cat and dog foods manufactured by the Menu Foods Inc.
Haven't heard of Menu Foods? That's because they are the not-so-secret manufacturers of North America's lowest-quality pet foods, including over a dozen supermarket housebrands. Until Friday, I'd never heard of them. A quick search for the Menu Foods name reveals that they are infamous among animal rights groups, because of their penchant for cruel animal testing.
Like many of you who read this blog, I think of myself as an obsessive pet parent. I try to feed my boys the highest-quality food that money can buy. I feed the boys Wellness Super5 Mix dry food and a mix of wet foods. Unfortunately, Nutro Natural Choice pouches have been a big part of that mix.
So far the boys have been ok and we have gotten rid of our Nutro pouches, but I'm still worried that symptoms may appear later on or that there may be long-term effects. Nobody really knows what was wrong with the food and I last fed them Nutro on Thursday.
I know that Nutro isn't as good a brand as something like Wellness or Wysong and I know that gravy pouches aren't as good as canned fare, but I fed the boys Nutro Natural Choice Turkey and Giblets, because it was one of the few wet foods they would eat. I thought to myself, "ok, this stuff is not as good as the $1.50 a can stuff, but it is a quality brand and it's the best brand you can get at chain stores like Petco and Petsmart." Boy was I wrong about the "quality" part.
Until this recall, Nutro never mentioned on their site or on their product packaging that their food is actually being churned out in the same factory as world-renowned cat foods like "Price Chopper Housebrand" and "Save-A-Lot." The home page of their site says:
For over 75 years, Nutro has created, tested, and produced the finest pet foods on the market. Our philosophy is simple: we constantly strive to provide better ingredients and better nutrition for better health, no matter what the cost.
Are they really providing "better ingredients" than Price Chopper or Save-a-Lot? The news is sketchy right now and we don't know for sure whether all the brands manufactured in that plant use the same ingredients. The AP (via CNN) reports that "the recalled products were made using wheat gluten purchased from a new supplier." To me that says one simple thing: Nutro products were made using the same gluten as cheap, low-quality cat foods. If they are using the same gluten as Foodtown supermarket's cat food, how many other ingredients do they have in common?
Is Nutro just putting a fancy package and snazzy name on the same low-grade cat food you get off the supermarket shelf? I've been feeding my boys Nutro products since they were kittens. The entire first year of their lives, Arthur and Beowulf had Nutro Natural Choice dry food every single day. I've been feeding them Nutro canned foods and pouches. Was I actually feeding them slop the whole time?
For those of you who aren't cat food snobs, I submit this analogous question. How would you feel if you were concerned about car safety so you bought a $40,000 Volvo and then years later found out it was manufactured in the same plant, using at least some of the same parts as a Yugo?